Pilot Programme Open. You are among the first to use Warrentor. What that means β†’
Using Warrentor Β· Step by step

How to use your template

Your template is a two-part document. Section 1 is a research prompt you run with an AI. Section 2 is the letter you send to the organisation. This page explains how to do both β€” and what to do if something goes wrong.

Before you start

What to have ready

Before you paste anything into an AI, gather these items. Having them at hand means the AI can give you a more useful and accurate research result.

Have these ready

The decision itself β€” any letter, notice, email, or message the organisation sent you.
The date β€” when the decision was made or communicated to you.
The outcome β€” what exactly was denied, issued, suspended, or refused.
The organisation's full name β€” as it appears on the correspondence you received.
The country β€” where the decision was made (not necessarily where you live).

Step 1

Fill in the top of the research prompt

Open your downloaded template. At the top of Section 1, you will see three fields marked [FILL IN]:

  • Organisation β€” the name of the organisation that made the decision
  • Country / jurisdiction β€” the country (or state/territory) where the decision was made
  • Sector β€” for most scenarios this is already filled in; for the generic template, choose the one that fits

Everything else in Section 1 is ready to use as-is. Do not edit the questions or instructions β€” they are written to get the best research result from the AI.

Step 2

Paste the research prompt into an AI

Copy the entire text of Section 1 and paste it into one of these AI systems:

  • Claude.ai β€” recommended for thorough research and source citations
  • ChatGPT β€” good general research capability
  • Any other capable AI research system

The AI will return: contacts at the organisation, external escalation bodies, the applicable legal framework, who to address your letter to, and a practical strategy recommendation.

Important β€” sources

The research prompt specifically instructs the AI to cite its sources for every item. If the AI does not cite a source, ask it to. If it cannot find a specific contact, ombudsman, or legal deadline, it should say so clearly. Do not accept a result where important fields are guessed or left vague.

If the AI gets something wrong

AI systems can sometimes produce incorrect or outdated information β€” particularly for contact details, addresses, and regulatory bodies. Before using any contact detail from the AI's research, do a quick web search to verify it is current. A 30-second check on the organisation's website or the regulator's site is enough.

Step 3

Fill in the letter template

With the AI's research in front of you, open Section 2 of your downloaded template. Fill in every field marked [FILL IN] or enclosed in square brackets:

a
Address block
Use the recipient, department, and address the AI identified. If the AI recommended sending a copy to the Data Protection Officer or Privacy Officer, prepare a second copy addressed to them.
b
Your details
Your full name, address, email, and phone. Use the address the organisation has on file for you β€” this helps them locate your record.
c
Decision description
Describe the decision in plain language. What was refused, issued, or denied? What effect did it have on you? Be factual and specific β€” this is not the place to express frustration, only to state what happened.
d
Response deadline
The template says [30 days / applicable statutory period]. Check what the AI found for the mandatory response period in your jurisdiction. If there is a legal deadline, use that. If not, 30 days is a reasonable and widely accepted standard.
Step 4

Send your letter

By post: Print, sign, and post. Keep a copy of the signed letter and note the date you sent it. Postal delivery is often the most formal and legally recognised method.

By email or portal: If the AI identified an email address or online complaint portal, you can send the letter as a PDF attachment. Save a copy of the sent email and any acknowledgement you receive.

Both: For important cases, sending by both post and email is reasonable β€” it maximises the chance of receipt and creates a clear record.

Record keeping

Keep every document related to this matter in one place: the original decision notice, your letter, the AI research, any response you receive, and any further correspondence. If you need to escalate later, having a clear record makes everything easier.

If things don't go to plan

What to do if there is no response β€” or you are not satisfied

If the organisation does not respond within the deadline you set, or their response does not address your questions, you have options. The AI's research will have identified the relevant external escalation body for your situation β€” this is typically an ombudsman, a regulator, or an administrative tribunal.

Before escalating, check the AI's research for time limits. Many external bodies have strict deadlines β€” some as short as 6 weeks from the original decision, or 3 months from the organisation's final response. Missing these windows can close off your options.

The organisation says their decision was not automated. What now?
That is itself an answer you can use. Ask them to confirm in writing who specifically made the decision, what information they had, and what authority they held. The questions in the letter template are designed to draw out this information.
The AI could not find the organisation's contacts.
Try the organisation's official website directly β€” look for "contact us", "complaints", "privacy", or "data protection". If the organisation is a government agency, the relevant government website often lists the correct complaints pathway. If you still cannot find it, the AI's research should have identified an external regulator or ombudsman you can contact instead.
The AI said there is no "right to explanation" in my country.
This is not the end. The letter template does not rely on a right to explanation β€” it asks questions any organisation should be willing to answer about their own process. Administrative transparency obligations, consumer protection law, and basic procedural fairness exist in most jurisdictions even where formal algorithmic rights do not.
Should I get a lawyer?
Warrentor is not legal advice and cannot tell you whether you need one. If the decision has a significant financial or personal impact, if a statutory deadline is approaching, or if the organisation's response suggests a legal dispute, speaking with a qualified lawyer is advisable. Many jurisdictions have free legal aid services or community legal centres that can help assess your situation.
Can I use this letter in multiple languages?
Yes. The templates are available in seven languages. If you are challenging an organisation in Spain but prefer to write in Dutch, you can β€” the letter is addressed to the organisation, not to you. However, be aware that the organisation may respond in their official language, and you may need to arrange translation of their response.

Ready to start?

Complete the assessment to receive your personalised template with the correct research prompt for your situation.

Check My Decision